Skip to main content

Love aaj kal

‘And we Twist’ the simple tale of love?

The point was made well. And well in advance. It was clear that Rishi (playing a Sardar Coffee shop owner in a phoren land) was trying to explain to Jai (an aspiring Khulla sand in his early/late twenties) what love is all about and how the Generation 2.0 cares not of the real thing – the pyaar, ishq mohobbat types. Now that was that. But why make an entire film trying to prove that point?

So there you have a couple a year into a relationship (Saif and Deepika) throwing a ‘breakup party’ to the surprise of their friends. They separate and decide to keep in touch like bosom pals. Giving dating tips, criticizing fashion sense and all that they couldn’t do as a ‘couple’. But when the warning of commitment lurks, the two find themselves helpless. A love too deep never confessed, is harder to reveal than to hide. And the ho hum drags along, with each of them taking their own sweet time to realize yehi pyaar hota hai and all that!

The point is, the film seems to obsessed in proving a point and making a statement about what love is and what it isn’t. And in all that, the joy of the characters journey isn’t enough endearing. Which indeed was the strength of Imtiaz Ali’s previous films – Jab We met and Socha Na tha. Both made their own points about the unpredictable ways of Love, but the characters were simply adorable. And their journey worth watching over and over again.

Which brings me to BIG issue with this one – the actors. Apart from Saif, none seems to grasp the character. In hindsight, it was Kareena’s interpretation of Geet that made Jab we met a masterpiece. Deepika is miles behind interpretation, and in fact looks confused in what she wants to portray. It takes skills to deliver dialogues with Punch, but to make silence speak is a far tougher craft. And Ms Padukone fails terribly. Her stares and vacant looks say nothing of the characters feelings in important scenes.

The directors choice of running two parallel tracks is interesting. The secondary plot of the Sikh Saif (the younger Rishi) is more watchable for its innocence and old world look, but it’s far too predictable and breaks abruptly, much to the disappointment of the audience.

The dialogues are failed by the acting. Any one who has seen Jab We met even once, can remember atleast a handful of lines. I cant remember but one here. Sad. The fascination with Hinglish seems most evident. The song “twist” celebrate the Hinglishism that our youth will most identify with. The Music? Well, could be better. Or better placed at least!

Overall all, this is a disappointing film. And certainly not comparable to Jab we met. But let me reserve the last word (and the last laugh) for the BIGGEST miscast in bollywood in quite some time. Brazilian model (Giselle Montero) plays a Gaanv ki Gori devoid of any lines and worse, devoid of any Ada- who was intelligently given no dialogues but ruined it all when she had to some Bhangra/Gidda or whatever she thought she was doing. It was hilariously wrong, Imtiaz.

After Jab We Met, maine Socha Na Tha that you could go this wrong..

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Bajirao Mastani - an epic SLB spectacle!

Bhansali ne Bajirao pe film banayi hai; Documentary Nahi!  I want to start my review with those lines simply to act as a disclaimer (much like the movie) to confirm that my views are of this movie as a movie and not as a piece of historic documentation of a much loved and respected character or a review of how well the film recreates the details of an era, which even historians agree isn't well documented. So then..  Everyone has a weakness and mine is mainstream Bollywood.. Every time a big budget multi starrer is in the making, I'm busy following up on it and eagerly awaiting the release. Add to it an A-list cast, appetising promos and interesting music, and I can't wait any more. Obviously, I was looking forward to Bajirao Mastani - a magnum opus by Sanjay Leela Bhansali, who is arguably the most gifted visualiser of our times - love them or hate them, you can't ignore that with every movie Bhansali has made, he has created unforgettable images. And who d

5 points about 3 idiots... Lot's in the name!

5 points about 3 idiots... Lot's in the name! Kartik KJ When I saw news clippings of the war of words between 3 idiots team and the writer of 5 point someone, I was moved to think and heres what I personally feel. its 5 points really.. (pun probably intented). 1. Is this a marketing gimmick? Sorry Chetan, but that's the first thing that comes to my mind. For of late, bollywood has stooped to abysmal levels to get people into movie halls. I am thinking, this is a reallllly cheap one (if it is, and I hope it isn't). Do you need such a bad gimmick for a film as strong as this one. But then again, this was the same team that withdrew the trailer of Prakash Jhas Raajneeti from the films launch, because they 'would rather do away with the trailer than have people distracted from 3 Idiots'. ???????? Duh!! Can a 3 minute trailer (I dont know the length really, but how big can a trailer be??) take away from the brilliant film that 3 idiots is???? Can crediting the author re

The rest is of course--- Hissss-story

Some suggestions to recover from the recent insults: May be Mallika Sherawat should walk the red carpet in CWG 2010 - like she did in Cannes with snakes all over her– some positive would come out of it.. all this snake spotiing can be camouflaged by calling it a promotional activity for her latest ‘international’ film – hissss! Wink, wink. Or why not have the Wildlife SOS team in cultural outfits (aka Amrish Puri in Nagina..) Spot a snake? And you just won an exclusive show of the “SnakeCharmers of India” . Congratulations on winning the “Incredible India” experience.. Goes well with the ‘land of snake charmers’ image that we have fought O-so-hard against. Funny, eh? The sarcasm is a result of both – embarrassment and anger. Some say it is media that has unnecessarily highlighted just the negatives. Others say that the under preparedness of the venue exposes the deep-rooted corruption and inefficiencies of the system. I don’t know which one is right. But the fact remains, that it d